Accéder au contenu principal

Mallampati Class 0 et Class 5


A New Class for Modified Mallampati Sign

  1. Kanti K. Gombar, MD
  1. Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care Government Medical College Chandigarh, India
The Mallampati sign, which is a simple, quick method to predict difficulty with tracheal intubation (1), has gained considerable popularity for airway examination during preanesthetic visits. This sign is dependent on the relative size of the tongue in relation to the pharyngeal structure, but its serious limitations must be evaluated. We report an observation we made during the preoperative airway assessment of a patient in whom we could not ascertain a Mallampati grading.
An 80-yr-old, 76-kg woman scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy had a history of repeated oral surgery (five times) for carcinoma of the tongue. During a preanesthetic check-up, we found a complete absence of a tongue, uvula, mandible, and other pharyngeal structures (Figures 1 and 2). Therefore, we were unable to perform Mallampati or modified Mallampati grading (2); hence, prediction of airway difficulty could not be ascertained. Because the patient refused to undergo the operation, we cannot say with certainty whether this patient had a difficult airway.
Figure 1. Front view of patient’s face with wide opened mouth showing the absence of pharyngeal structures.
Figure 2. Side view of patient’s face.
Ezri et al. (3) described a clinical situation in which the epiglottis (tip and posterior aspect) could be visualized on mouth opening and protrusion of the tongue and proposed a Mallampati class 0 for this clinical situation. We propose another Mallampati class for cases in which a Mallampati grading cannot be ascertained because of partial or complete absence of the tongue and/or pharyngeal structures. In such an event, preoperative a clinical airway assessment using this grading system is difficult. This situation may be graded as class 5. However, further study is therefore required in relation to difficult intubation in this class.

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

The Muse Brooklyn

http://abcirque.com http://www.amny.com/things-to-do/circus-class-at-the-muse-brooklyn-teaches-acrobatic-skills-1.13781898 https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx-D67pAxGz/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx7e3GFgpp2/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx5xpoPn_hm/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx40FSvj2Tf/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx0p224DkxE/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxzxjhqFO1S/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxyJmIaAeSd/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxxweSaF6q4/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxxSsdcAjFg/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bxvr0SSgpPs/ https://new.mta.info/L-Project http://themusegowanus.com http://instagram.com/themusebrooklyn https://www.facebook.com/TheMuseBrooklyn/ https://twitter.com/TheMuseBrooklyn https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkzh62AIfOI7XU3I0P6rWIQ

Systemic Lidocaine Decreased the Perioperative Opioid Analgesic Requirements but Failed to Reduce Discharge Time After Ambulatory Surgery

Perioperative systemic lidocaine significantly reduces opioid requirements in the ambulatory setting without affecting time to discharge. Postoperative pain is the most common reason for delay in discharge and unplanned hospital admission after ambulatory surgery. 1–3 Because postoperative pain is to a large extent an inflammatory phenomenon, administration of systemic local anesthetics, which have inflammatory modulatory properties, 4 could significantly reduce pain and therefore allow more rapid discharge. 5 Lidocaine has an excellent safety record when administered by low-dose infusion. 5–7 However, whereas decreased hospital stay after inpatient surgery has been demonstrated, the effect of intraoperative and early postoperative lidocaine infusion on duration of stay after ambulatory surgery is not known. Although it see...

Government Health Policy and Nurse Anesthetists

Recent federal legislation and changes to the U.S. Medicare program have expanded opportunities for certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) to provide care to more patients and receive reimbursement for their services, yet many states still restrict their scope of practice and limit their pay. A special section in the current issue of  Clinical Scholars Review , the journal of advanced practice nursing published by Columbia Nursing, explores how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) empowers CRNAs to help make anesthesia services more accessible to patients; it also highlights laws in New York and other states that may impede the expanded access to care envisioned by ACA. FULL ARTICLE