Accéder au contenu principal

Vulcan DoS Vs Akamai

In the past I had to do several DoS security audits, with múltiples types of tests and intensities. Sometimes several DDoS protections were present like Akamai for static content, and Arbor for absorb part of the bandwith.

One consideration for the DoS/DDoS tools is that probably it will loss the control of the attacker host, and the tool at least has to be able to stop automatically with a timeout, but can also implement remote response checks.

In order to size the minimum mbps needed to flood a service or to retard the response in a significant amount of time, the attacker hosts need a bandwith limiter, that increments in a logarithmic way up to a limit agreed with the customer/isp/cpd.

There are DoS tools that doesn't have this timeouts, and bandwith limit based on mbps, for that reason I have to implement a LD_PRELOAD based solution: bwcontrol

Although there are several good tools for stressing web servers and web aplications like apache ab, or other common tools used for pen-testing, but I also wrote a fast web flooder in c++ named wflood.

As expected the most effective for taking down the web server are the slow-loris, slow-read and derivatives, few host were needed to DoS an online banking. 
Remote attacks to database and highly dynamic web content were discarded, that could be impacted for sure.

I did another tool in c++ for crafting massive tcp/udp/ip malformed packets, that impacted sometimes on load balancers and firewalls, it was vulcan, it freezed even the firewall client software.

The funny thing was that the common attacks against Akamai hosts, where ineffective, and so does the slow-loris family of attacks, because are common, and the Akamai nginx webservers are well tunned. But when tried vulcan, few intensity was enough to crash Akamai hosts.

Another attack vector for static sites was trying to locate the IP of the customer instead of Akamai, if the customer doesn't use the Akamai Shadow service, it's possible to perform a HTTP Host header scan, and direct the attack to that host bypassing Akamai.

And what about Arbor protection? is good for reducing the flood but there are other kind of attacks, and this protection use to be disabled by default and in local holidays can be a mess.

Related posts

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

آفرینک | تماشای آنلاین انیمیشن و کارتون

https://afarinak.com/tags/%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C%D9%85%DB%8C%D8%B4%D9%86-%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%A7%D8%B3%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1/ https://afarinak.com/tags/%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B4%D8%AA%D8%B1%DB%8C%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C%D9%85%DB%8C%D8%B4%D9%86-%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-2016/ https://afarinak.com/tags/best-animated-movies-2017/ https://tidano.com/ https://funibo.com/ http://www.aparat.com/afarinak https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAD67ZyQn7_qBcGjPgw https://www.instagram.com/afarinak_com/ https://twitter.com/afarinak

Go Macro Bars

Go Macro Energy Bars - In fact, brown rice syrup weighs more than a lot of the opposite ingredients in these bars. So regardless that the bars comprise more oats and nuts by quantity, brown rice syrup must be listed first because it weighs more. As a side observe, I like firms that give again to society. I used to be given the opportunity to strive their three new bar flavors (despatched to me by GoMacro). It was also shocking, since these bars usually are not as candy as many other bars in the marketplace. Plus, a portion of the proceeds from their Everlasting Joy Bars goes towards feeding the homeless. It appears that evidently by regulation substances have to be listed so as of weight, and brown rice syrup could be very dense. And GoMacro selects one taste every quarter to highlight as their "Give Back Bar." They donate 10% of the gross sales of that bar to a non-revenue group. Nevertheless, I was concerned that brown rice syrup is the first ingredient in most o...