Accéder au contenu principal

Comparison of acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (a new test) with modified Mallampati test in predicting difficult visualization of larynx

Maintaining a patent airway following the induction of general anesthesia is undeniably the most imperative concern for an anesthesiologist. Unanticipated difficult intubation, especially when associated with difficult or lack of ventilation in anesthetized patients, is still the main cause of morbidity or mortality.1
The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy or tracheal intubation was reported to be in the range of 0.1–20.2%; this variation is due to the different patient populations and criteria used.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Prediction of difficult intubation in preoperative evaluation has been attempted by numerous investigators using simple bedside physical examinations based on anatomical landmarks such as modified Mallampati test (MMP), interincisive distance, thyromental distance (TMD), sternomental distance, upper lip bite test, and hyomental distance ratio,3, 7, 10, 11 all of which have shown different sensitivities and specificities.
In the authors' experience, difficult visualization of larynx (DVL) was observed in individuals whose neck was situated deep in the chest (i.e., with a sloping clavicle); therefore, to consider a bedside test based on surface anatomy is suggested. We observed that the portion of the arm–chest junction above the level of suprasternal notch might be used as an indicator to estimate DVL. This study was aimed to evaluate the predictive validity of a new index (based on the surface anatomy of the upper chest), called the acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (AASI), and compare it with a previously established test (MMP) for assessing difficult laryngoscopic view in patients who were candidates for general anesthesia.

                    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>SOURCE

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

The Muse Brooklyn

http://abcirque.com http://www.amny.com/things-to-do/circus-class-at-the-muse-brooklyn-teaches-acrobatic-skills-1.13781898 https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx-D67pAxGz/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx7e3GFgpp2/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx5xpoPn_hm/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx40FSvj2Tf/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx0p224DkxE/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxzxjhqFO1S/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxyJmIaAeSd/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxxweSaF6q4/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxxSsdcAjFg/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bxvr0SSgpPs/ https://new.mta.info/L-Project http://themusegowanus.com http://instagram.com/themusebrooklyn https://www.facebook.com/TheMuseBrooklyn/ https://twitter.com/TheMuseBrooklyn https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkzh62AIfOI7XU3I0P6rWIQ

Systemic Lidocaine Decreased the Perioperative Opioid Analgesic Requirements but Failed to Reduce Discharge Time After Ambulatory Surgery

Perioperative systemic lidocaine significantly reduces opioid requirements in the ambulatory setting without affecting time to discharge. Postoperative pain is the most common reason for delay in discharge and unplanned hospital admission after ambulatory surgery. 1–3 Because postoperative pain is to a large extent an inflammatory phenomenon, administration of systemic local anesthetics, which have inflammatory modulatory properties, 4 could significantly reduce pain and therefore allow more rapid discharge. 5 Lidocaine has an excellent safety record when administered by low-dose infusion. 5–7 However, whereas decreased hospital stay after inpatient surgery has been demonstrated, the effect of intraoperative and early postoperative lidocaine infusion on duration of stay after ambulatory surgery is not known. Although it see...

Government Health Policy and Nurse Anesthetists

Recent federal legislation and changes to the U.S. Medicare program have expanded opportunities for certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) to provide care to more patients and receive reimbursement for their services, yet many states still restrict their scope of practice and limit their pay. A special section in the current issue of  Clinical Scholars Review , the journal of advanced practice nursing published by Columbia Nursing, explores how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) empowers CRNAs to help make anesthesia services more accessible to patients; it also highlights laws in New York and other states that may impede the expanded access to care envisioned by ACA. FULL ARTICLE