Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain are two of the major
concerns for patients presenting for surgery. The causes of PONV are
multifactorial and can largely be categorized as patient risk factors,
anaesthetic technique, and surgical procedure. Antiemetics work on
several different receptor sites to prevent or treat PONV. This is
probably why numerous studies have now demonstrated that using more than
one antiemetic is usually more effective and results in fewer
side-effects than simply increasing the dose of a single antiemetic. A
multimodal approach to PONV should not be limited to drug therapy alone
but should involve a holistic approach starting before operation and
continuing intraoperatively with risk reduction strategies to which are
added prophylactic antiemetics according to the assessed patient risk
for PONV. With the increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of
acute pain, especially the occurrence of peripheral and central
hypersensitization, it is unlikely that a single drug or intervention is
sufficiently broad in its action to be adequately effective, especially
with moderate or greater pain. Although morphine and its congeners are
usually the foundation of pain management regimens, as their dose
increases so does the incidence of side-effects. Thus, the approach for
the management of acute postoperative pain is to use multiple drugs or
modalities (e.g. regional anaesthesia) to maximize pain relief and
reduce side-effects.
CASE A 22-year-old man was brought to the ED complaining of abdominal pain after a rollover motor vehicle accident. He was the front seat passenger and was wearing a seat belt. Although he was trapped in the vehicle and it caught on fire, he did not suffer any cutaneous burns. History The patient's past medical history was significant for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. He admitted to using tobacco and alcohol socially, but denied illicit drug use. He denied any medication use or drug allergies. A review of systems was positive for complaints of abdominal pain and anxiety. Physical examination The patient's vital signs were: BP, 112/51 mm Hg; heart rate, 110 beats/minute; respirations, 23; SpO 2 , 95% on room air; and temperature, 37.4° C (99.3° F). On ED arrival, he was awake, alert, and oriented but appeared anxious and agitated. His pupils were equal, round, and reactive to light. His head was normocephalic with a 2-cm laceration on the left ear. The pati...
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire