Accéder au contenu principal

Human Subthalamic Neuron Spiking Exhibits Subtle Responses to Sedatives


Human Subthalamic Neuron Spiking Exhibits Subtle Responses to Sedatives

MacIver, M. Bruce M.Sc., Ph.D.*; Bronte-Stewart, Helen M. M.D., M.S.E.†; Henderson, Jaimie M. M.D.‡; Jaffe, Richard A. M.D., Ph.D.*; Brock-Utne, John G. M.D., Ph.D.*

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: During deep brain stimulation implant surgery, microelectrode recordings are used to map the location of targeted neurons. The effects produced by propofol or remifentanil on discharge activity of subthalamic neurons were studied intraoperatively to determine whether they alter neuronal activity.
Methods: Microelectrode recordings from 11 neurons, each from individual patients, were discriminated and analyzed before and after administration of either propofol or remifentanil. Subthalamic neurons in rat brain slices were recorded in patch-clamp to investigate cellular level effects.
Results: Neurons discharged at 42 ± 9 spikes/s (mean ± SD) and showed a common pattern of inhibition that lasted 4.3 ms. Unique discharge profiles were evident for each neuron, seen using joint-interval analysis. Propofol (intravenous bolus 0.3 mg/kg) produced sedation, with minor effects on discharge activity (less than 2.0% change in frequency). A prolongation of recurrent inhibition was evident from joint-interval analysis, and propofol's effect peaked within 2 min, with recovery evident at 10 min. Subthalamic neurons recorded in rat brain slices exhibited inhibitory synaptic currents that were prolonged by propofol (155%) but appeared to lack tonic inhibitory currents. Propofol did not alter membrane potential, membrane resistance, current-evoked discharge, or holding current during voltage clamp. Remifentanil (0.05 mg/kg) had little effect on overall subthalamic neuron discharge activity and did not prolong recurrent inhibition.
Conclusions: These results help to characterize the circuit properties and feedback inhibition of subthalamic neurons and demonstrate that both propofol and remifentanil produce only minor alterations of subthalamic neuron discharge activity that should not interfere with deep brain stimulation implant surgery.
LIENS

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

The Muse Brooklyn

http://abcirque.com http://www.amny.com/things-to-do/circus-class-at-the-muse-brooklyn-teaches-acrobatic-skills-1.13781898 https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx-D67pAxGz/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx7e3GFgpp2/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx5xpoPn_hm/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx40FSvj2Tf/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bx0p224DkxE/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxzxjhqFO1S/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxyJmIaAeSd/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxxweSaF6q4/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BxxSsdcAjFg/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bxvr0SSgpPs/ https://new.mta.info/L-Project http://themusegowanus.com http://instagram.com/themusebrooklyn https://www.facebook.com/TheMuseBrooklyn/ https://twitter.com/TheMuseBrooklyn https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkzh62AIfOI7XU3I0P6rWIQ

Fw:

Consider this message as your last warning. We hacked your system! We have copied all the data from your device to our own servers. Curious videos were recorded from your camera and your actions while watching porn. Your device was infected with our virus when you visited the porn site. The Trojan virus gives us full access, allows us to control your device. The virus allows not only to see your screen, but also to turn on your camera, microphone, without your knowledge. We took over the video from your screen and camera, then we mounted a video in which you can see you watching porn in one part of the screen and masturbating in the other. But that’s not all! We have access to all the contacts in your phone book and social networks. It won’t take us long to send this video to your friends, family and friends on social networks, messengers and email in minutes. We have a lot of audio recordings of your personal conversations, where a lot of “intere...

Systemic Lidocaine Decreased the Perioperative Opioid Analgesic Requirements but Failed to Reduce Discharge Time After Ambulatory Surgery

Perioperative systemic lidocaine significantly reduces opioid requirements in the ambulatory setting without affecting time to discharge. Postoperative pain is the most common reason for delay in discharge and unplanned hospital admission after ambulatory surgery. 1–3 Because postoperative pain is to a large extent an inflammatory phenomenon, administration of systemic local anesthetics, which have inflammatory modulatory properties, 4 could significantly reduce pain and therefore allow more rapid discharge. 5 Lidocaine has an excellent safety record when administered by low-dose infusion. 5–7 However, whereas decreased hospital stay after inpatient surgery has been demonstrated, the effect of intraoperative and early postoperative lidocaine infusion on duration of stay after ambulatory surgery is not known. Although it see...